| Title |
Comparison of mesenchymal tissues-derived stem cells for in vivo chondrogenesis: suitable conditions for cell therapy of cartilage defects in rabbit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Research, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00441-008-0633-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hideyuki Koga, Takeshi Muneta, Tsuyoshi Nagase, Akimoto Nimura, Young-Jin Ju, Tomoyuki Mochizuki, Ichiro Sekiya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 20% |
| Engineering | 17 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#240
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,356
of 83,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them