↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
51 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00464-002-9167-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. R. Langenbach, J. Schmidt, H. Zirngibl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Materials Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,859
of 6,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,794
of 54,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.