| Title |
Continuous antibiotic production by an immobilized cyanobacterium in a seaweed-type bioreactor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, April 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00693059 |
| Authors |
Aparat Chetsumon, Isamu Maeda, Fusako Umeda, Kiyohito Yagi, Yoshiharu Miura, Tadashi Mizoguchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#499
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,611
of 25,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them