| Title |
Circumcision: a religious obligation or ‘the cruellest of cuts’?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp10x482194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammed Saqib Anwar, Farhan Munawar, Qashif Anwar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 22% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Azerbaijan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#821,891
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#353
of 4,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,925
of 174,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.