↓ Skip to main content

From PET detectors to PET scanners

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
From PET detectors to PET scanners
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00259-003-1266-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L. Humm, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Alberto Del Guerra

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 226 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 69 29%
Engineering 39 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Chemistry 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 52 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#981
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,284
of 52,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.