| Title |
Effect of Microaerobic Fermentation in Preprocessing Fibrous Lignocellulosic Materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12010-012-9717-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manar Arica Alattar, Terrence R. Green, Jordan Henry, Vitalie Gulca, Mikias Tizazu, Robby Bergstrom, Radu Popa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,770,197
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#197
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,924
of 165,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.