↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the above and belowground biomass of planted and coppiced Eucalytpus globulus stands in NW Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Modeling the above and belowground biomass of planted and coppiced Eucalytpus globulus stands in NW Spain
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13595-015-0493-6
Authors

Daniel J. Vega-Nieva, Enrique Valero, Juan Picos, Enrique Jiménez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Environmental Science 8 19%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#720
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,400
of 286,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.