Title |
Rapid image recognition of body parts scanned in computed tomography datasets
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11548-009-0403-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Volker Dicken, B. Lindow, L. Bornemann, J. Drexl, A. Nikoubashman, H.-O. Peitgen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 39% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 9 | 39% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
Engineering | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#225
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,288
of 96,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.