↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of cellulases by impurities in Steam-Exploded wood

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, November 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of cellulases by impurities in Steam-Exploded wood
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, November 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf02799176
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. P. Sinitsyn, L. S. Clesceri, H. R. Bungay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#544
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,312
of 8,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them