↓ Skip to main content

Innovations in titanium powder processing

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Innovations in titanium powder processing
Published in
JOM, May 2000
DOI 10.1007/s11837-000-0027-y
Authors

Vladimir Moxson, O. N. Senkov, F. H. Froes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 41%
Materials Science 20 34%
Chemistry 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,250
of 40,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.