↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Z and W sex chromosomal architectures in elegant crested tinamou (Eudromia elegans) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) and the process of sex chromosome differentiation in…

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 756)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the Z and W sex chromosomal architectures in elegant crested tinamou (Eudromia elegans) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) and the process of sex chromosome differentiation in palaeognathous birds
Published in
Chromosoma, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00412-006-0088-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yayoi Tsuda, Chizuko Nishida-Umehara, Junko Ishijima, Kazuhiko Yamada, Yoichi Matsuda

Abstract

To clarify the process of avian sex chromosome differentiation in palaeognathous birds, we performed molecular and cytogenetic characterization of W chromosome-specific repetitive DNA sequences for elegant crested tinamou (Eudromia elegans, Tinamiformes) and constructed comparative cytogenetic maps of the Z and W chromosomes with nine chicken Z-linked gene homologues for E. elegans and ostrich (Struthio camelus, Struthioniformes). A novel family of W-specific repetitive sequences isolated from E. elegans was found to be composed of guanine- and cytosine-rich 293-bp elements that were tandemly arrayed in the genome as satellite DNA. No nucleotide sequence homologies were found for the Struthioniformes and neognathous birds. The comparative cytogenetic maps of the Z and W chromosomes of E. elegans and S. camelus revealed that there are partial deletions in the proximal regions of the W chromosomes in the two species, and the W chromosome is more differentiated in E. elegans than in S. camelus. These results suggest that a deletion firstly occurred in the proximal region close to the centromere of the acrocentric proto-W chromosome and advanced toward the distal region. In E. elegans, the W-specific repeated sequence elements were amplified site-specifically after deletion of a large part of the W chromosome occurred.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Unspecified 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#1,730,517
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#13
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,666
of 158,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them