↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Perceived Neighborhood Stressors Across Diverse Communities in New York City

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Perceived Neighborhood Stressors Across Diverse Communities in New York City
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10464-015-9736-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessie L. C. Shmool, Michael A. Yonas, Ogonnaya Dotson Newman, Laura D. Kubzansky, Evelyn Joseph, Ana Parks, Charles Callaway, Lauren G. Chubb, Peggy Shepard, Jane E. Clougherty

Abstract

There is growing interest in the role of psychosocial stress in health disparities. Identifying which social stressors are most important to community residents is critical for accurately incorporating stressor exposures into health research. Using a community-academic partnered approach, we designed a multi-community study across the five boroughs of New York City to characterize resident perceptions of key neighborhood stressors. We conducted 14 community focus groups; two to three in each borough, with one adolescent group and one Spanish-speaking group per borough. We then used systematic content analysis and participant ranking data to describe prominent neighborhood stressors and identify dominant themes. Three inter-related themes regarding the social and structural sources of stressful experiences were most commonly identified across neighborhoods: (1) physical disorder and perceived neglect, (2) harassment by police and perceived safety and (3) gentrification and racial discrimination. Our findings suggest that multiple sources of distress, including social, political, physical and economic factors, should be considered when investigating health effects of community stressor exposures and psychological distress. Community expertise is essential for comprehensively characterizing the range of neighborhood stressors that may be implicated in psychosocial exposure pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 25%
Psychology 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 36 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,244,862
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#821
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,327
of 267,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.