| Title |
Zinc Oxysulfide Thin Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electronic Materials, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11664-009-1069-8 |
| Authors |
Sundeep H. Deulkar, Jow-Lay Huang, Michael Neumann-Spallart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 15% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Materials
#238
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,055
of 165,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Materials
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.