↓ Skip to main content

Advances in animal cell recombinant protein production: GS-NS0 expression system

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Advances in animal cell recombinant protein production: GS-NS0 expression system
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, February 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008170710003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise M. Barnes, Catherine M. Bentley, Alan J. Dickson

Abstract

The production of recombinant proteins using mammalian cell expression systems is of growing importance within biotechnology, largely due to the ability of specific mammalian cells to carry out post-translational modifications of the correct fidelity. The Glutamine Synthetase-NS0 system is now one such industrially important expression system.Glutamine synthetase catalyses the formation ofglutamine from glutamate and ammonia. NS0 cellscontain extremely low levels of endogenous glutaminesynthetase activity, therefore exogenous glutaminesynthetase can be used efficiently as a selectablemarker to identify successful transfectants in theabsence of glutamine in the media. In addition, theinclusion of methionine sulphoximine, an inhibitor ofglutamine synthetase activity, enables furtherselection of those clones producing relatively highlevels of transfected glutamine synthetase and henceany heterologous gene which is coupled to it. Theglutamine synthetase system technology has been usedfor research and development purposes during thisdecade and its importance is clearly demonstrated nowthat two therapeutic products produced using thissystem have reached the market place.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 174 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 29 16%
Other 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 24%
Engineering 15 8%
Chemical Engineering 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#60
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,515
of 111,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them