You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coexpression networks identify brain region–specific enhancer RNAs in the human brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn.4063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pu Yao, Peijie Lin, Akira Gokoolparsadh, Amelia Assareh, Mike W C Thang, Irina Voineagu |
| Abstract |
Despite major progress in identifying enhancer regions on a genome-wide scale, the majority of available data are limited to model organisms and human transformed cell lines. We have identified a robust set of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) expressed in the human brain and constructed networks assessing eRNA-gene coexpression interactions across human fetal brain and multiple adult brain regions. Our data identify brain region-specific eRNAs and show that enhancer regions expressing eRNAs are enriched for genetic variants associated with autism spectrum disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 31% |
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#675,906
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,239
of 5,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,700
of 262,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#24
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.