| Title |
Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: Indications, limitations, and complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02725339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas F. Wood, D. Michael Rose, Mathew Chung, David P. Allegra, Leland J. Foshag, Anton J. Bilchik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 57% |
| Engineering | 6 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,727,332
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,730
of 6,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,492
of 37,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.