↓ Skip to main content

Studies of stimulus parameters for seizure disruption using neural network simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Studies of stimulus parameters for seizure disruption using neural network simulations
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00422-007-0166-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

William S. Anderson, Pawel Kudela, Jounhong Cho, Gregory K. Bergey, Piotr J. Franaszczuk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Unknown 78 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 29%
Researcher 24 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Neuroscience 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Physics and Astronomy 10 12%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#187
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,686
of 68,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.