↓ Skip to main content

Novel caged clusters of silicon: Fullerenes, Frank-Kasper polyhedron and cubic

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Materials Science, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 292)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Novel caged clusters of silicon: Fullerenes, Frank-Kasper polyhedron and cubic
Published in
Bulletin of Materials Science, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/bf02712795
Authors

Vijay Kumar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 43%
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Materials Science
#45
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,773
of 129,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Materials Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them