↓ Skip to main content

Development of titanium-doped carbon–carbon composites

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Development of titanium-doped carbon–carbon composites
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10853-009-3327-9
Authors

A. Centeno, R. Santamaría, M. Granda, R. Menéndez, C. Blanco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 23%
Materials Science 3 23%
Chemistry 2 15%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,883
of 93,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.