↓ Skip to main content

Metallocanes of group 14 elements 2. Derivatives of tin (Review)

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Metallocanes of group 14 elements 2. Derivatives of tin (Review)
Published in
Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10593-007-0132-8
Authors

A. A. Selina, S. S. Karlov, E. Kh. Lermontova, G. S. Zaitseva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 50%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds
#237
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,454
of 78,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them