| Title |
APP/PS1KI bigenic mice develop early synaptic deficits and hippocampus atrophy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-009-0539-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henning Breyhan, Oliver Wirths, Kailai Duan, Andrea Marcello, Jens Rettig, Thomas A. Bayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,770,197
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,056
of 2,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,191
of 93,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.