| Title |
An aqueous rechargeable lithium battery based on doping and intercalation mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10008-009-0869-3 |
| Authors |
G. J. Wang, L. C. Yang, Q. T. Qu, B. Wang, Y. P. Wu, R. Holze |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 27% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Energy | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#103
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,648
of 114,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them