↓ Skip to main content

Rational Filters for Passive Depth from Defocus

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Rational Filters for Passive Depth from Defocus
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, May 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1007905828438
Authors

Masahiro Watanabe, Shree K. Nayar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Ireland 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 66 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 33%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 42 53%
Engineering 22 28%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#458
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,692
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.