Title |
Exploiting geographic references of documents in a geographical information retrieval system using an ontology-based index
|
---|---|
Published in |
GeoInformatica, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10707-010-0106-3 |
Authors |
Nieves R. Brisaboa, Miguel R. Luaces, Ángeles S. Places, Diego Seco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 22 | 44% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from GeoInformatica
#30
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,171
of 166,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoInformatica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them