↓ Skip to main content

A review of the use of topical analgesics for myofascial pain

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A review of the use of topical analgesics for myofascial pain
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, October 2002
DOI 10.1007/s11916-002-0079-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles E. Argoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#339
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,799
of 46,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.