↓ Skip to main content

Lyme disease vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Lyme disease vaccine
Published in
Infection, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01713340
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. P. Wormser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#426
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,267
of 26,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.