↓ Skip to main content

On Similarity Coefficients for 2×2 Tables and Correction for Chance

Overview of attention for article published in Psychometrika, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
On Similarity Coefficients for 2×2 Tables and Correction for Chance
Published in
Psychometrika, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11336-008-9059-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthijs J. Warrens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 18%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,753,975
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Psychometrika
#149
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,913
of 80,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychometrika
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.