↓ Skip to main content

A 13-year follow-up of Finnish patients with Salla disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 13-year follow-up of Finnish patients with Salla disease
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s11689-015-9116-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liisa E. Paavola, Anne M. Remes, Marika J. Harila, Tarja T. Varho, Tapio T. Korhonen, Kari Majamaa

Abstract

Salla disease (SD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder leading to severe intellectual disability. SD belongs to the Finnish disease heritage, and it is caused by mutations in the SLC17A5 gene. The aim of the study was to investigate the course of neurocognitive features of SD patients in a long-term follow-up. Neuropsychological and neurological investigations were carried out on 24 SD patients, aged 16-65 years, 13 years after a similar examination. The survival analysis showed excess mortality among patients with SD after the age of 30 years. The course of the disease was progressive, but follow-up of SD patients revealed that motor skills improved till the age of 20 years, while mental abilities improved in most patients till 40 years of age. Verbal comprehension skills did not diminish during the follow-up, but productive speech deteriorated because of dyspraxia and dysarthria. Motor deficits were marked. Ataxia was prominent in childhood, but it was replaced by athetotic movements during the teens. Spasticity became more obvious with age especially in severely disabled SD patients. Younger SD patients performed better in almost every task measuring mental abilities that then seem to remain fairly constant till early sixties. Thus, the results indicate better prognosis in cognitive skills than earlier assumed. There is an apparent decline in motor skills after the age of 20 years. The early neurocognitive development predicts the later course of motor and cognitive development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Psychology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,959,761
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#424
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,121
of 266,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.