↓ Skip to main content

Liquid bridge instability applied to microfluidics

Overview of attention for article published in Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Liquid bridge instability applied to microfluidics
Published in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10404-005-0038-7
Authors

Kieran Curran, Stéphane Colin, Lucien Baldas, Mark Davies

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 56%
Materials Science 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#128
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,295
of 57,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.