↓ Skip to main content

Enriching a motion database by analogous combination of partial human motions

Overview of attention for article published in The Visual Computer, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Enriching a motion database by analogous combination of partial human motions
Published in
The Visual Computer, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00371-007-0200-1
Authors

Won-Seob Jang, Won-Kyu Lee, In-Kwon Lee, Jehee Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 67%
Engineering 3 14%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from The Visual Computer
#169
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,866
of 160,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Visual Computer
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.