| Title |
Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone R de Bruin, Caroline A Baan, Jeroen N Struijs |
| Abstract |
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system to encourage improvements in healthcare quality. P4P is a payment model that rewards healthcare providers for meeting pre-established targets for delivery of healthcare services by financial incentives. Based on their performance, healthcare providers receive either additional or reduced payment. Currently, little is known about P4P schemes intending to improve delivery of chronic care through disease management. The objectives of this paper are therefore to provide an overview of P4P schemes used to stimulate delivery of chronic care through disease management and to provide insight into their effects on healthcare quality and costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 202 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,413,996
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#986
of 8,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,881
of 141,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#12
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.