↓ Skip to main content

The Problem of Degeneracy in Structure and Motion Recovery from Uncalibrated Image Sequences

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
The Problem of Degeneracy in Structure and Motion Recovery from Uncalibrated Image Sequences
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, August 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1008140928553
Authors

Philip H.S. Torr, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Andrew Zisserman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
China 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 85 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 51 53%
Engineering 24 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#458
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 34,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.