| Title |
Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12178-009-9053-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chad D. Cole, Todd D. McCall, Meic H. Schmidt, Andrew T. Dailey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 46% |
| Engineering | 25 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#229
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,815
of 93,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.