↓ Skip to main content

A comparative evaluation of interest point detectors and local descriptors for visual SLAM

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Vision and Applications, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
A comparative evaluation of interest point detectors and local descriptors for visual SLAM
Published in
Machine Vision and Applications, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00138-009-0195-x
Authors

Arturo Gil, Oscar Martinez Mozos, Monica Ballesta, Oscar Reinoso

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Spain 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 132 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 35%
Student > Master 42 27%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 79 52%
Engineering 52 34%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Materials Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 14 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Machine Vision and Applications
#162
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,115
of 95,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Vision and Applications
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them