Title |
Review on the proceeding of automatic seedlings classification by computer vision
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Forestry Research, September 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02871708 |
Authors |
Yang Yan-zhu, Zhao Xue-zeng, Wang Wei-jie, Wu Xian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 56% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forestry Research
#35
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,473
of 45,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forestry Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them