↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of cationic surfactant adsorption at the solid–aqueous interface

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
566 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanism of cationic surfactant adsorption at the solid–aqueous interface
Published in
Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, May 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0001-8686(03)00002-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Atkin, V.S.J. Craig, E.J. Wanless, S. Biggs

Abstract

Until recently, the rapid time scales associated with the formation of an adsorbed surfactant layer at the solid-aqueous interface has prevented accurate investigation of adsorption kinetics. This has led to the mechanism of surfactant adsorption being inferred from thermodynamic data. These explanations have been further hampered by a poor knowledge of the equilibrium adsorbed surfactant morphology, with the structure often misinterpreted as simple monolayers or bilayers, rather than the discrete surface aggregates that are present in many surfactant-substrate systems. This review aims to link accepted equilibrium data with more recent kinetic and structural information in order to describe the adsorption process for ionic surfactants. Traditional equilibrium data, such as adsorption isotherms obtained from depletion approaches, and the most popular methods by which these data are interpreted are examined. This is followed by a description of the evidence for discrete aggregation on the substrate, and the morphology of these aggregates. Information gained using techniques such as atomic force microscopy, fluorescence quenching and neutron reflectivity is then reviewed. With this knowledge, the kinetic data obtained from relatively new techniques with high temporal resolution, such as ellipsometry and optical reflectometry, are examined. On this basis the likely mechanisms of adsorption are proposed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 425 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 26%
Researcher 98 22%
Student > Master 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 5%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 68 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 126 29%
Engineering 69 16%
Chemical Engineering 40 9%
Materials Science 27 6%
Physics and Astronomy 23 5%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 94 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Colloid & Interface Science
#239
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,826
of 54,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Colloid & Interface Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them