| Title |
Preparation of Cationic Immunovesicles Containing Cationic Peptide Lipid for Specific Drug Delivery to Target Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10616-005-3764-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takuya Sugahara, Shinichi Kawashima, Akiko Oda, Yoshio Hisaeda, Keiichi Kato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#60
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,081
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.