| Title |
Comparison of growth and lipid content in three Botryococcus braunii strains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-005-9005-7 |
| Authors |
Yan Li, Jian G. Qin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 25% |
| Researcher | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 39% |
| Engineering | 18 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#500
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,523
of 155,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.