You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-Touch Table System for Medical Visualization: Application to Orthopedic Surgery Planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1109/tvcg.2011.224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claes Lundstrōm, Thomas Rydell, Camilla Forsell, Anders Persson, Anders Ynnerman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 82 | 64% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
#916
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,116
of 246,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.