| Title |
Spectrophotometric determination of cationic and anionic surfactants with anionic dyes in the presence of nonionic surfactants, part I: A general aspect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microchimica Acta, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01242699 |
| Authors |
Shoji Motomizu, Mitsuko Oshima, Yasuhiro Hosoi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 40% |
| Professor | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#193
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,609
of 62,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.