You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complement mediators in ischemia–reperfusion injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinica Chimica Acta, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cca.2006.06.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thiruma V. Arumugam, Tim Magnus, Trent M. Woodruff, Lavinia M. Proctor, Ian A. Shiels, Stephen M. Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinica Chimica Acta
#498
of 4,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,397
of 88,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinica Chimica Acta
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.