↓ Skip to main content

Improvement of neurological and ocular symptoms of Behçet’s disease after the introduction of infliximab

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Improvement of neurological and ocular symptoms of Behçet’s disease after the introduction of infliximab
Published in
Rheumatology International, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00296-018-4054-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marko Barešić, Mirna Reihl, Mario Habek, Nenad Vukojević, Branimir Anić

Abstract

Behçet's disease is a chronic inflammatory condition of unknown origin characterized by multiple organ involvement. The most common symptoms of Behçet's disease are recurrent oral and/or genital ulcerations in combination with symptoms affecting eyes, skin, central and peripheral nervous system, blood vessels and gastrointestinal tract. We present a 43-year-old female patient with the history of recurrent episodes of genital and oral ulcerations, elevated acute phase reactants and skin lesions. The diagnosis of Behçet's disease has been delayed (for more than 10 years) and reached only after she developed neurological and ocular symptoms. Treatment with glucocorticoids and azathioprine was partially successful. High doses of glucocorticoids were needed to control the disease and cyclosporine A was nephrotoxic. Remission was reached after the introduction of infliximab (plus methotrexate) and glucocorticoids were stopped. In the recent years, infliximab has been accepted as a standard therapy for refractory cases of Behçet's disease (neurological, ocular or gastrointestinal). Our patient presented with refractory ocular and neurological symptoms and infliximab was effective for both manifestations. Long-term side-effects of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressants can be avoided with TNF-α blockade. We emphasize the importance of a timely and accurate diagnosis and significance of excluding more common diseases in a work-up algorithm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,526,239
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,563
of 2,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,590
of 328,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.