↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of individual rivers to Great Barrier Reef nitrogen exposure with implications for management prioritization

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of individual rivers to Great Barrier Reef nitrogen exposure with implications for management prioritization
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.04.069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas H. Wolff, Eduardo Teixeira da Silva, Michelle Devlin, Kenneth R.N. Anthony, Stephen Lewis, Hemerson Tonin, Richard Brinkman, Peter J. Mumby

Abstract

Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) runoff from Great Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments is a threat to coral reef health. Several initiatives address this threat, including the Australian Government's Reef 2050 Plan. However, environmental decision makers face an unsolved prioritization challenge: determining the exposure of reefs to DIN from individual rivers. Here, we use virtual river tracers embedded within a GBR-wide hydrodynamic model to resolve the spatial and temporal dynamics of 16 individual river plumes during three wet seasons (2011-2013). We then used in-situ DIN observations to calibrate tracer values, allowing us to estimate the contribution of each river to reef-scale DIN exposure during each season. Results indicate that the Burdekin, Fitzroy, Tully and Daintree rivers pose the greatest DIN exposure risk to coral reefs during the three seasons examined. Results were used to demonstrate a decision support framework that combines reef exposure risk with river dominance (threat diversity).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,780,684
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#1,382
of 9,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,785
of 344,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#33
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.