| Title |
The Promise and Peril of Continuous In Vitro Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-004-0307-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glenn C. Johns, Gerald F. Joyce |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 26% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#465
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,456
of 57,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.