↓ Skip to main content

Staging exhibitions: methods and tools for modelling narrative structure to produce interactive performances with virtual actors

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Staging exhibitions: methods and tools for modelling narrative structure to produce interactive performances with virtual actors
Published in
Virtual Reality, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10055-003-0113-x
Authors

M. Klesen, M. Kipp, P. Gebhard, T. Rist

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 9%
France 1 5%
South Africa 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 16 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 50%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Engineering 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#124
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,612
of 133,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.