↓ Skip to main content

Static and cyclic fatigue behaviour in alumina ceramics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science Letters, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Static and cyclic fatigue behaviour in alumina ceramics
Published in
Journal of Materials Science Letters, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00422676
Authors

Sung Eun Park, Bong Seok Hahn, Hong Lim Lee

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#105
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,277
of 76,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.