| Title |
Powder diffraction investigations of plasma sprayed zirconia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00375275 |
| Authors |
B. Bondars, G. Heidemane, J. Grabis, K. Laschke, H. Boysen, J. Schneider, F. Frey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 32% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 22 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 10% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,498,424
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#337
of 5,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,047
of 72,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#15
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.