Title |
The charcoal effect in Boreal forests: mechanisms and ecological consequences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, July 1998
|
DOI | 10.1007/s004420050536 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
D. A. Wardle, O. Zackrisson, M.-C. Nilsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Sweden | 2 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 184 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 39 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 19% |
Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
Other | 40 | 20% |
Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 61 | 31% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 35 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,960
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,613
of 33,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.