| Title |
Control of turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step by local forcing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, November 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00189044 |
| Authors |
K. B. Chun, H. J. Sung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 75 | 74% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Energy | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#158
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,821
of 29,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them