↓ Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Referral Rates of Children with Gender Identity Disorder: Some Hypotheses

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Sex Differences in Referral Rates of Children with Gender Identity Disorder: Some Hypotheses
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, June 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1025748032640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth J. Zucker, Susan J. Bradley, Mohammad Sanikhani

Abstract

From 1978 through 1995, a sex ratio of 6.6:1 of boys to girls (N = 275) was observed for children referred to a specificity clinic for gender identity disorder. This article attempts to evaluate several hypotheses regarding the marked sex disparity in referral rates. The sexes did not differ on four demographic variables (age at referral, IQ, and parent's social class and marital status) and on five indices of general behavior problems on the Child Behavior Checklist; in addition, there was only equivocal evidence that boys with gender identity disorder had significantly poorer peer relations than girls with gender identity disorder. Although the percentage of boys and girls who met the complete DSM-III-R criteria for gender identity disorder was comparable, other measures of sex-typed behavior showed that the girls had more extreme cross-gender behavior than the boys. Coupled with external evidence that cross-gender behavior is less tolerated in boys than in girls by both peers and adults, it is concluded that social factors partly account for the sex difference in referral rates. Girls appear to require a higher threshold than boys for cross-gender behavior before they are referred for clinical assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 16 20%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,645,679
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#236
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,203
of 29,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them